The body of a woman believed to be Nancy Guthrie was found near the Phoenix Canal, and when police turned it over, her entire face was…
SHOCKING NEWS: The Body of a Woman Believed to Be Nancy Guthrie Found Near Phoenix Canal — Disturbing Detail Leaves Investigators with More Questions Than Answers
Authorities are investigating a disturbing discovery after a woman’s body, believed to be that of Nancy Guthrie, was found early this morning near the Phoenix Canal. The discovery has sent shockwaves through the community and intensified the ongoing mystery surrounding her disappearance.
According to preliminary reports from local law enforcement, a passerby spotted what appeared to be a body partially concealed near the edge of the canal shortly after sunrise. Emergency responders arrived at the scene within minutes and confirmed that the victim was an adult woman.
However, when investigators carefully turned the body over, they were confronted with a chilling detail: the woman’s entire face appeared severely damaged and almost unrecognizable. Officials have not yet confirmed whether the injuries occurred before or after death, but the condition of the face has made immediate identification extremely difficult.
Sources close to the investigation say the body was found wearing clothing similar to what Nancy Guthrie was last reported wearing before she disappeared. This has led authorities to suspect that the victim could indeed be her, though forensic testing and dental record comparisons are still underway to confirm the identity.
Detectives are treating the case with extreme caution. One investigator at the scene reportedly described the discovery as “deeply suspicious,” noting that the damage to the face could suggest an attempt to prevent identification.
“The circumstances surrounding this discovery raise serious concerns,” a police spokesperson said. “We are working to determine who this victim is and what exactly happened near the canal.”
Crime scene technicians spent several hours collecting evidence from the surrounding area, including footprints, discarded items, and possible surveillance footage from nearby roads and businesses. Divers were also seen searching parts of the canal in case additional evidence had been thrown into the water.
Meanwhile, Nancy Guthrie’s family has been notified about the discovery but authorities have emphasized that the identity of the victim has not yet been officially confirmed.
Investigators are now waiting for the results of an autopsy and DNA analysis, which could provide crucial answers in the coming days.
George Soros’ Network Bankrolling ‘No Kings’ Protests: Report
George Soros’ network of organizations is helping bankroll the “No Kings” protests that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and tens of thousands of demonstrators plan to join on Saturday, according to new disclosures and archived grant data.
Soros, a billionaire investor and one of the Democratic Party’s most prolific donors, is the founder of the Open Society Foundations, which oversees the Open Society Action Fund. In 2023, that fund issued a two-year grant of $3 million to the progressive group Indivisible, according to public filings. The stated purpose was to support the organization’s “social welfare activities,” Fox News reported.
Indivisible is currently serving as the group managing participant data and communications for the “No Kings” protests taking place in Washington, D.C., and in cities nationwide.
Soros’ foundations say they have distributed more than $32 billion globally to advance what they describe as “open and democratic societies.” His son, Alex Soros, serves as chairman of the board.
Indivisible’s website lists Ezra Levin as executive co-director, alongside his wife, Leah Greenberg. Greenberg previously served as policy director for former Virginia gubernatorial candidate Tom Perriello, who later became executive director of the Open Society Foundations from 2018 through 2023 — deepening organizational ties between the two entities.
In 2017, Indivisible also received a $350,000 grant from Tides Advocacy, an arm of the left-leaning Tides Network. The Tides Foundation, another affiliate, has previously faced criticism for funding groups accused of supporting anti-Israel demonstrations and campus unrest.
While the 2024 grant report has not yet been released by the IRS or Open Society Foundations, records show Soros’ network has provided Indivisible with more than $7.6 million since its formation in 2017.
A spokesperson for the Open Society Foundations told Fox News Digital that its grants are lawful and that the organization does not dictate or manage how recipients conduct their operations.
“We support a wide range of independent organizations that work to deepen civic engagement through peaceful democratic participation, a hallmark of any vibrant society and a right protected by the Constitution,” the spokesperson said. “Our grantees make their own decisions about their work, consistent with the law and the terms of their grant agreements.”
Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, was the first to draw attention to the Soros ties in an interview Thursday with Fox News host Sean Hannity, warning that the “No Kings” rallies could become violent.
“There’s considerable evidence that George Soros and his network are behind funding these rallies, which may well be riots all across the country,” Cruz said.
Cruz cited his STOP FUNDERs Act — short for “Financial Underwriting of Nefarious Demonstrations and Extremist Riots” — which he introduced in July. The bill would authorize the Department of Justice to use RICO statutes to prosecute individuals or organizations that fund violent protests.
“This politicized march is being organized by Soros operatives and funded by Soros money. No one denies these basic facts,” Cruz told Fox News Digital. “The Trump administration and the Republican Congress are committed to countering this network of left-wing violence.”
The Open Society Foundations, in a statement on its website, emphasized that it does not pay or train protesters and “opposes all forms of violence, including violent protests.”
Indivisible’s own protest guide states, “Protests are most effective when we peacefully use our constitutionally protected rights of assembly and speech and properly prepare ahead of time.”
Republican lawmakers remain concerned about the network of funding that fuels mass demonstrations.
Rep. Buddy Carter, R-Ga., sent a letter Thursday to Attorney General Pam Bondi, urging an immediate investigation into the Open Society Foundations and other Soros-backed groups.
“The funding of organizations that engage in, support, or incite political violence must not be tolerated,” Carter wrote, citing a recent report that found Soros’ foundations distributed more than $80 million to groups accused of endorsing or participating in domestic extremism.
As protests prepare to fill streets nationwide this weekend, scrutiny over their funding — and Soros’ influence — continues to mount.
BREAKING: David Muir’s Calm Response to Karoline Leavitt Turns Live Discussion Into Viral Moment — Viewers Divided After On-Air Exchange About Truth, Media, and Responsibility
The discussion began as a routine television segment about public responsibility, but within minutes it turned into one of the most talked-about broadcast moments of the week after Karoline Leavitt and David Muir exchanged words that viewers quickly described as tense, controlled, and unusually personal for a live studio conversation.
Karoline Leavitt had just finished a sharp speech about what she called “leaders who should stay out of politics and stop preaching,” a line delivered firmly and without hesitation, clearly aimed at what she described as a growing trend of public figures speaking about truth and responsibility while avoiding criticism themselves.
The discussion began as a routine television segment about public responsibility, but within minutes it turned into one of the most talked-about broadcast moments of the week after Karoline Leavitt and David Muir exchanged words that viewers quickly described as tense, controlled, and unusually personal for a live studio conversation.
Karoline Leavitt had just finished a sharp speech about what she called “leaders who should stay out of politics and stop preaching,” a line delivered firmly and without hesitation, clearly aimed at what she described as a growing trend of public figures speaking about truth and responsibility while avoiding criticism themselves.
Across the table sat David Muir, his posture straight and composed, the same calm presence that millions of viewers recognize from years of watching him guide difficult conversations on national television, and his expression did not change even as the tone in the studio began to tighten.
The host moderating the discussion glanced between them, sensing the shift in energy, and asked a simple question that would unexpectedly push the conversation into territory no one in the room seemed fully prepared for, even though the topic itself sounded ordinary at first.
“David, Karoline says public figures who talk about truth and responsibility should stay quiet,” the host said carefully, choosing each word as if aware that the next response could shape the entire segment, “what do you say to that?”
Muir did not interrupt, did not react immediately, and did not show any sign of irritation, which only made the moment feel heavier, because viewers watching live could sense that he was choosing his response very deliberately instead of answering on instinct the way television debates often unfold.
He reached slowly into a folder lying in front of him, pulled out a small note card, and placed it on the table with a motion so controlled that several people later said the gesture itself made the room feel quieter, as if everyone understood something unusual was about to happen.
Nearly All Dems Oppose SAVE Act Despite Broad Public Support for Voter ID
The SAVE America Act (H.R. 22) would require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship — such as a passport or birth certificate — when registering to vote in federal elections. It would also require government-issued photo identification for in-person voting and direct states to verify voter rolls against federal databases to ensure only citizens are registered.
President Donald Trump has made the bill a top legislative priority, arguing that election integrity is foundational to public trust.
“All voters must show proof of citizenship in order to vote,” Trump said at a recent Republican event in Miami. He later posted on Truth Social that the bill “must be done immediately” and warned he may refuse to sign other legislation until Congress sends it to his desk. “MUST GO TO THE FRONT OF THE LINE… GO FOR THE GOLD,” he wrote.
Polling data consistently shows broad support for voter ID requirements across party and demographic lines. According to Pew Research Center, 83% of Americans favor requiring government-issued photo ID to vote, including 95% of Republicans and 71% of Democrats. Gallup polling has found 84% overall support for photo ID requirements and 83% support for requiring proof of citizenship when registering to vote for the first time.
The U.S. House passed the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act in February by a narrow 218–213 vote, with support coming almost entirely from Republicans. Only a single House Democrat voted in favor of the bill, meaning roughly 99.5% of Democrats opposed legislation that polling shows is supported by a large majority of Americans.
CNN data analyst Harry Enten has said voter ID “is NOT controversial in this country,” noting that strong majorities across racial and partisan groups support the requirement. NBC News anchor Tom Llamas similarly observed that while voter ID enjoys wide public support, most Democrats in Congress oppose it.
Despite that polling, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has sharply criticized the legislation as it moves to the Senate.
“It’s about voter registration,” Schumer said in remarks opposing the bill. “It allows ICE to kick tens of millions of people off the rolls… And they don’t tell them until Election Day.”
“This is a bill that destroys the country,” he added. “It is not about showing ID when you show up to vote. It’s about the voter registration rolls, destroying them, purging them.”
Republicans dispute that characterization, arguing the bill enforces existing federal law that limits voting in federal elections to U.S. citizens. The legislation would require proof of citizenship at registration and strengthen roll maintenance procedures, but it does not eliminate voting rights for eligible citizens.
Supporters say the measure is a “commonsense” safeguard designed to prevent non-citizens from being registered or casting ballots in federal contests. They also argue that photo ID requirements are already common in daily life, from boarding flights to purchasing certain goods.
The bill now faces a steep path in the Senate, where 60 votes would likely be required to overcome a filibuster. With Democrats holding enough seats to block the measure, its future remains uncertain absent bipartisan agreement.
May you like
Trump has framed the issue in political as well as policy terms, arguing that stricter voter verification would reshape the electoral landscape. He has claimed that if proof-of-citizenship requirements were fully enforced, Democrats “probably won’t win an election for 50 years.”
With midterm elections approaching, the SAVE America Act has become one of the most contentious legislative battles in Washington. The divide between overwhelming public support in polling and near-unanimous Democratic opposition in Congress is likely to remain a central talking point as debate intensifies in the Senate.
